0.09/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1920 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 240 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 06:39:49 EDT 2025 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.41 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5YyP7uvij/E---3.1_20558.p 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_8 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # post_as_ho12 with pid 20636 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by post_as_ho12 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFFBN 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 130s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # post_as_ho10 with pid 20645 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by post_as_ho10 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFFBN 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 130s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # Proof found! 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: a > a > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: (a > $o) > a). 0.15/0.43 thf(cCT31, conjecture, ~(?[X1:a > a > $o]:(![X2:a > $o]:(?[X3:a]:((((X1 @ X3)=(X2))<=>((X2)=(X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5YyP7uvij/E---3.1_20558.p', cCT31)). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X1:a > a > $o]:(![X2:a > $o]:(?[X3:a]:((((X1 @ X3)=(X2))<=>((X2)=(X2)))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cCT31])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X8:a > $o]:(((((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X8))!=(X8))|((X8)=(X8)))&(((X8)!=(X8))|((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X8))=(X8))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o]:((((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))=(X2))|((X2)!=(X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))=(X2))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X10:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2) @ X10)<=>(X2 @ X10))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X3:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2) @ X3)|~((X2 @ X3)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X3:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~((X2 @ Z0))))) @ X3)|(X2 @ X3))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_6])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X3:a]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2) @ X3)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ Z0))))) @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))))), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])]), c_0_9])]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.43 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 2 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 3 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 17 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 2 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 3 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 12 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 33 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 15 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 2 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 1 0.15/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 4 0.15/0.43 # ...of those cached : 1 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 10 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 4 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 13 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 2 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1555 0.15/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 42 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.004 s 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1580 pages 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.007 s 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.008 s 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages 0.15/0.43 % E exiting 0.15/0.43 % E exiting 0.15/0.43 EOF